🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to reinitiate nuclear talks with Washington as long as it is handled with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations worked, and shared fresh requests had been made by go-betweens to reopen discussions with the American leadership. He said Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit attacked atomic facilities for safety concerns.

Walking a Complex Course

Araghchi is navigating a difficult path since Iran aims to avoid appear to be proceeding from a stance of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged more resilient in military terms and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will never give up" – the main reason of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Earlier Talks Abruptly Terminated

The prior phases of discussions between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when Israel, with US support, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the US president asserting the locations had been destroyed. Subsequently, Western states exercised their authority to reinstate international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Tehran representatives said they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the discussions that American atomic experts could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Officials claimed repeatedly they had achieved a deal with the US representative the US official only for the agreement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Position

Tehran representatives stated the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the proposal could be reintroduced in various formats if negotiations reopen.

The American leader in recent days claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Tehran representatives state they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from Washington either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been criticized of inactivity in the wake of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran says negotiations is not part of a show.

Negotiating Position

In his address to the forum, designed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the concept of international law, Araghchi stated the 12-day war revealed the conflict could not be resolved by combat operations. He said the strikes commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and concluded with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with full US knowledge and coordination, making confidence challenging to restore.

Dialogue Remains the Final Answer

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had abandoned dialogue; it was America and the European states that had consistently attempted to impose their desires during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be alive and remains the ultimate solution to settle disputes, but its criteria, regulations and tenets must be respected."

"If they address to the nation of Iran with the tone of respect and honor, they will obtain a reply in the same tone."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of repair and recovery, the foreign minister said he was confident Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We learned multiple understandings from this engagement; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He continued: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to eliminate, stays intact. The sites and equipment, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is important is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to break. The Iranian people have developed more resilient, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the administration and the nation in the aftermath of this assault."